A Northern Kentucky defense attorney on what police contact does (and doesn’t) mean, and why the time to understand your rights is before the conversation
Sponsored educational content
By Joe Suhre, Suhre & Associates DUI and Criminal Defense Lawyers

The call usually comes on an ordinary afternoon. An officer or detective introduces himself, sounds friendly enough, and says, “We’d just like to ask you a few questions.” Maybe he asks whether you could stop by the station this week. Then you hang up, and one question crowds out every other thought: Am I in trouble?

After years of defending criminal cases across Northern Kentucky and Greater Cincinnati, I can tell you the honest answer: not necessarily. But what you do next matters more than most people realize.

Does being contacted mean you’re a suspect?

Police reach out to people for all kinds of reasons. You may be a witness. You may have information about someone else. You may simply have been near a place they’re looking into, or know a person involved. Or you may be a focus of the investigation. Being approached and questioned does not, by itself, mean you are suspected of a crime.

I have seen every one of those situations in Kentucky courtrooms.

Here is the harder part: officers generally do not have to tell you where you fit. Investigators are allowed to keep their theory of a case to themselves. So, you shouldn’t assume you’re a suspect, but you also shouldn’t assume you’re “just a witness” because that’s how it sounded on the phone.

“I just want to explain what happened.” What’s the harm?

It may be the most natural sentence in the English language, and I understand the instinct completely. Most people believe that if they did nothing wrong, answering questions can only help.

But even completely truthful answers can complicate your situation. Details get misunderstood. Memory is imperfect. Honest people misremember times, dates, and sequences every day. Your timeline may innocently conflict with another witness’s account, or with a receipt or a camera. And your answers can hand investigators information they didn’t previously have. The U.S. Supreme Court recognized this reality decades ago: even an innocent-sounding answer can furnish a “link in the chain of evidence” – which is exactly why the right against self-incrimination protects the innocent as well as the guilty.

One bright line, always: this is never about outsmarting anyone or shading the truth.

Lying to investigators can itself be a crime. Declining to answer questions is not.

That distinction matters more than anything else in this article.

“They never read me my rights — doesn’t that matter?”

This is the misconception I hear most often. Miranda warnings are required for custodial interrogation (questioning that happens after you’ve been taken into custody). A voluntary conversation on your porch, over the phone, or in an interview room you’re free to leave usually requires no warning at all, and what you say is generally still usable. The Supreme Court has also held that simply going quiet is not the same as invoking your rights. If you intend to remain silent or want a lawyer, say so — out loud, in plain words.

Do I have to return the detective’s call?

No. If a detective has called and asked you to come in and talk, you are not required to return the call, you are not required to keep the conversation going if you happen to pick up, and you are not required to drive down to the station for an “interview.” My recommendation is simpler than that: don’t. Call a lawyer first and let the lawyer return the call on your behalf. That one step costs you nothing and protects everything.

Understand what that phone call actually is. A detective who could compel your presence would not be asking. He would have a warrant, or he would be at your door. The invitation is an invitation precisely because the investigation isn’t finished — and the most efficient way to finish it is to have you fill in the gaps yourself, on a recorded line, in a room you cannot leave without permission. “We just need to clear a few things up” and “you’re not in any trouble” are not assurances. They are technique. I don’t say that to be cynical about detectives; I say it because it is their job to build a case, and a suspect who talks is the fastest route there.

I also want to address the objection I hear most often, because it is the reason people talk when they shouldn’t: declining to speak with police does not make you look guilty. Invoking your right to counsel and your right to remain silent is the exercise of a constitutional right, not an admission of anything, and it can be done politely. “I’m not going to answer questions without my attorney” is a complete sentence. Say it and stop there. Prosecutors are not permitted to use your silence against you at trial, and in my experience no case has ever gotten worse because a client called me before he called the detective back. I cannot say the reverse.

One clarification, because people conflate the two situations and the rules genuinely differ. If you are stopped by an officer on the street or pulled over in traffic, you do have a limited obligation to identify yourself. In Kentucky – your name, plus your operator’s license if you are the one driving. That is the entire obligation. In Ohio – your name, address, and date of birth if the officer asks and has a lawful basis for the stop;

What you were doing, where you were coming from, whether you’d had anything to drink — none of that is required, and all of it goes into a report. But that is a different article. A detective’s phone call is not a stop. You are not detained, you are not in custody, and nothing about that call obligates you to say a word.

When does calling an attorney make sense — and what does the attorney actually do?

If investigators want a formal interview, keep contacting you, ask you to come to the station, start asking detailed questions about your own actions — or you simply can’t tell whether you’re being treated as a witness or a possible suspect — that is a very reasonable moment to get legal advice, before you decide what to say.

And a defense lawyer’s first job here is not to say “don’t cooperate.” It’s to find out what is actually being investigated, assess where you stand, communicate with law enforcement when that helps, and work out with you whether an interview makes sense — and on what terms. Sometimes the right answer is a scheduled conversation with counsel present. Sometimes it’s a respectful no. Either way, it becomes a decision made with information instead of a reaction made under pressure.

Being contacted by police does not necessarily mean charges are coming. Many conversations with investigators end quietly. But the time to understand your rights and your situation is before a conversation that cannot be taken back.

You don’t have to assume the worst. You also don’t have to figure out what the contact means by yourself.

If police have reached out to you or a family member in Northern Kentucky or Greater Cincinnati, Suhre & Associates offers free, confidential consultations, 24 hours a day: (859) 663-2900.

Joe Suhre is the owner of Suhre & Associates, a criminal defense firm serving Northern Kentucky and the Greater Cincinnati region. This article is general information, not legal advice.